Proof that a low frame rate can be just as effective! There are subtle gestures of movement in some frames, which I think helps the piece to flow. You see the motion lines and your brain fills in the gaps between the frames. Quite clever really, I wonder if it was intentional.
Tuesday, 25 May 2010
Monday, 24 May 2010
Design for Distribution - ELECTRABEL
All that work for 10 seconds of footage - it's unreal, and could have easily been achieved digitally. But that's just not the point now is it? There's a certain authentic quality achieved doing it by hand, the imperfections and subtle changes between each frame are what make this so beautiful.
Wednesday, 19 May 2010
Wednesday, 12 May 2010
Design for Distribution - Rotoscope technique
Love this effect. It was done by a Met student, so I'm almost reluctant to say I admire it - but give praise where it's due.. I do like this effect. It'd be extremely easy - though very time consuming to rip off. So I'm definitely not going to be doing that any time soon. Looks to me like he's done at least 15/20 frames per second - it's pretty seamless huh? If you also take into account that it's been coloured as well.. These few seconds of footage must've taken the best part of a week.
Here's his Youtube channel anyway, some interesting stuff.
http://www.youtube.com/user/munkyflux#p/a/u/2/uCeho2Rbw_Q
Here's his Youtube channel anyway, some interesting stuff.
http://www.youtube.com/user/munkyflux#p/a/u/2/uCeho2Rbw_Q
Design for Distribution - A Scanner Darkly
Looks a little like the frame blending technique I'm testing in After Effects right now.. I assume something similar but far more advanced was used to give this film such a seamless quality. The blocks of colour slide around on top of each other - it's almost nauseating. I prefer the juddering, stop frame nature of some of the other videos I've looked at.
Tuesday, 11 May 2010
Design for Distribution - Save Radio 6
A list of messages from influential artists bidding to save Radio 6 from being axed later this year.
Thursday, 6 May 2010
Design for Distribution - Adam Buxton's Big Mixtape
Some visuals to help me get started on the Adam's mixtape slot for Radio 6
Really like this clinical effect, looks a bit like an x-ray or something.
Might try some photo's against a light box.
I quite like the idea of having writing on the tape.. there's lots of possibilities for animation within this, and also the chance to learn a technique that I know exists but have never had the opportunity to try!
Monday, 3 May 2010
Psyop
When I watched this for the first time I remembered the moment when motion graphics first had an impact on me. Back when Si Scott was really going for it, and I was a bit of a fan when I was studying for my A levels, I remember seeing he did the title sequence for The Charlotte Church show, and being a bit blown away. Now that I really think about it, it was only the pieces of his work that had been animated that really stuck in my mind. I don't remember hardly any print work he did.
Anyway,
This video is one of the lesser known pieces by Psyop - for MtvHD.
The transitions between scenes are incredibly imaginative, and the content really appeals to me too. The birds and trees mix together almost seamlessly, even with the 3D aspect in there as well. Pretty swish.
Oh, here's that Charlotte Church thing as well..
http://www.breedlondon.com/artists/si-scott/new-artwork/2-4/
http://www.breedlondon.com/artists/si-scott/new-artwork/2-4/
Sunday, 2 May 2010
Design for Distribution - Courtesy of the BBC
http://www.bbc.co.uk/commissioning/tvbranding/picturesize.shtml
A fantastic resource for anyone confused about picture sizing for digital media. Though it's a bit technical, it explains the industry standard is what it is, and why widescreen for HD tv is not 1024x576 but 1050x576.
Interesting stuff, and it's little bits like this that stop you looking an idiot later when you send off work to an agency in an obsolete sizing.
A fantastic resource for anyone confused about picture sizing for digital media. Though it's a bit technical, it explains the industry standard is what it is, and why widescreen for HD tv is not 1024x576 but 1050x576.
Interesting stuff, and it's little bits like this that stop you looking an idiot later when you send off work to an agency in an obsolete sizing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)